خبير لبناني: "المعارضات السورية" مفككة.. وتخليها عن السيادة الوطنية خيانة عظمى
Lebanese expert: "Syrian opposition" Broken .. And the abandonment of national sovereignty is treason
http://www.albaathmedia.sy/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46147:%D8%AE%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%81%D9%83%D9%83%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%AE%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AE%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%B9%D8%B8%D9%85%D9%89&catid=142:slide&Itemid=317
http://megalodon.jp/2011-1102-0452-51/www.albaathmedia.sy/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46147:%D8%AE%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%
Monday, 31 October 2011 12:37
In the context of its review of the structure of "the Syrian oppositions" and their behavior, and dispersion in the contexts of contradictory, with a few of them have at least the national priorities are clear, depends researcher and strategic expert Brigadier General Dr. Amin Muhammad Hutait when the definition of "revolution", recalling that the revolution in the definition and concept are "shown by the behavior of the objected to the behavior of a system imposed on him or rejecting him Tiglath factor dropped in order to restore the system which suits him instead, and if it means the people and the power to govern."
So, according to Hutait that the revolution is not a popular revolution recognizes her "legitimate revolutionary," but if the majority of the people that embraced the rebels extricating themselves to the ruling and that the majority of these are government agreed to the rules of the alternative and installed a ruling which, contrary to this would be out of power, riots by the behavior respond to anything except the concept of a revolution, it may be a rebellion or insurrection or chaos or ... Or even terrorism and criminal especially if it is to resort to deadly violence and destructive.
Out of this raises the question of what is happening today in Syria from the mobility and ask you to say in the matter as a "revolution"?
To answer, see Hutait, it must be to stop at the scene that formed during the eight-month old street movements carried out in Syria, where the record the following:
1) that the percentage of conflict with the Syrian government, in the highest estimate, does not reach to one sixth of the Syrian people if awarded both came out even once in, but if we were more realistic, or hardening of the account, the ratio does not reach the price of the people not to say the least means that they named themselves "opposition or revolutionaries" that only a minority of the very few people while the vast majority can at the same time to get out of the pro-government and supportive movement reform more than the sum of those many times over (as happened in the last week in each Damascus, Aleppo and Latakia).
2) In the analysis of tissue "opponents," then we see that the conflict between them heated to a certain extent mistrust, mutual - this describes the other as "client system" and that is it described as "rebels last time" and another says about others "Trojan horse" is contained by a "mercenary working for the outside" is because the concept of trust and cohesion, including zero, which means that the strength of these cannot be the Society are cumulative, but adversarial erosion and Hrasthm against each of not less than their hostility to the regime, and this leads us to something important we express it by saying: If total minority remains popular, how can be the case with each of the minority in terms of size and efficiency .. It is also a minority in the minority. This indicates the risk of something, too, with the success of one of these in the access to the Yemeni power of the self by means establishing authoritarian rule of the minority that do not achieve stable and just evaluate, and then that will face the real revolution.
3) and because the representativeness of these "opponents" (oppositions) too little at home, Syrian, they abandoned their "national sovereignty", which should be characterized by the "national revolutionary" in order to gain support abroad, which has accounts of hostility against Syria, resistance and opposition to the project control and colonialism, two students have the audacity "foreign military intervention" in the name of "protection of civilians", then the serious call for "request of no-fly zone" which means simply call Israel and its allies to control the airspace for the destruction of Syria and ordained "rulers" to guard the interests of the west. Their behavior that they commit - and it is shame - treason against their country and its people here and ask you that the Syrian people in the ancient nationalism and patriotism can accept a traitor to his homeland the foreigner to be hired by the governor? The answer is absolutely not.
4) In order to compensate for wasting procedure for failure to possess the majority of the people to prove the presence of force, I turned some of the components of the opposition of those who call themselves "revolutionaries" to terrorism, murder and assault on the citizens, staff and public and private property, including out completely from the provisions of Islamic Sharia (which Itagty Some of them claim the revolution for it) and is unrelated to the legal principles and rules enshrined also in the positive law.
5) Finally, in the time that record positive some of the opponents - especially those based inside the country - in terms of their rejection of foreign intervention, and their condemnation of the use of violence and vandalism, and their response to the call for national dialogue, (the behavior of estimator is consistent with the national interest of the real), we are surprised rejected opposition abroad to respond to the dialogue, and requiring a dialogue to one goal: "delivered power" and ask those who refuse to build any power rejection, and live their hopes:
- Are the majority of the Syrian People do not own, but they are against them?
- Or on the strength of terrorist groups that are limited to narrow it down in a specific region in central Syria (Homs on) and is being processed?
- Or on the Arab League, which tried to evaluate them a match for the Government menu legally happens, forcing it to return to Syria and to recognize and deal with reality as it exists, despite trying to play and exercise knowing that it will not succeed in it?
- Or the UN Security Council, who is challenging the so-called "Syrian National Council" to send armies to destroy the Syrian Arab Army, defender of the homeland to their rulers? And not know that this dream has become impossible after the international changes and the group «Albraix» block the path to the West in seeking to take such a decision?
- Or on the military intervention of NATO begins to "no-fly zone" without a resolution or decision of the Security Council is leading the West to the occupation of Syria, as happened in Iraq a decade ago? Do not they know that the times change and the West is in decline and unable to wage a new war is working to close the existing fronts and withdraw his army of them? And then not know that any war waged against Syria today will inspire the region and impose the results will not be supported by those who have not the ability to control it?
Seems to be ignoring the fact that the vanity or unrealistic policy that governs the behavior of "opponents" of European hotels, bank accounts Gulf, and satellite media spin, and groups of terrorism and murder, and they are their positions intransigent these lock gates of a political solution, at a time rejecting the so-called "security solution "We see them pushing for instability, which requires security processing to put an end to terrorism and crime, forgetting established fact is that it really wants the interest of his country he has to sit to the table of national dialogue in his inner Mtelmusa the way for the construction of the Syrian state of modern democracy with others from the Syrians, having recognized stems from the reality and the real size of the representative from the use of an exhibition abroad.
Al-Qamishli: Kurdish Patriotic Conference in Syria founded
http://www.kurdwatch.org/index?aid=2151
KURDWATCH, November 1, 2011—On October 26 and 27, 2011, the inaugural meeting of the Kurdish Patriotic Conference in Syria took place in al-Qamishli. Taking part in the conference were parties from the Kurdish Patriotic Movement, with the exception of the Democratic Union Party (PYD), as well as other chosen participants; there was a total of 257 people in attendance. 100 of the participants belonged to the Kurdish parties; of the other 157 participants, 25 were representatives of youth groups.
The conference executive committee is composed of 45 people, 20 of whom are party representatives (the chairman and a politburo member from each party); of the 25 other members, 6 are representatives of youth groups.
Apart from the Democratic Union Party (PYD), the Kurdish Future Movement in Syria as well a number of activists who have been organizing dissident demonstrations in Kurdish regions since mid-March declined the invitation to participate in the conference. In addition, ʿAbdurrahman Aluji's Kurdish Democratic Party in Syria (el-Partî) and the Rêkeftin were not represented at the conference.
The Kurdish Patriotic Conference in Syria formulated the following resolutions and positions:
The crisis in Syria can only be resolved through a change in the authoritarian and totalitarian system and its organizational, political, and intellectual structures. The security state must be dissolved and a more secular, democratic, diverse, parliamentary, and decentralized state must be constructed.
Military and security forces must be withdrawn from the Syrian cities.
The Kurdish people are living on their historical territory; it is a significant part of the social, national, and historical Syrian structure. This necessitates the recognition of the Kurdish people as a significant part of the Syrian nation and as the second largest ethnic group in the country. In addition, a just, democratic solution to the Kurdish question is necessary; the Kurdish people must receive the right to determine its own fate within a unified Syrian state.
The Kurdish youth movement is recognized as part of the peaceful Syrian revolution. Freedom of religion is to be guaranteed by the constitution. The ethnic rights of Syrian Christians, Chaldo-Assyrians, and other minorities must be maintained. As a part of the Syrian patriotic opposition, the conference rejects any individual dialogue with the regime.
All Kurdish coalitions (Political Council, Kurdish Democratic Coalition, Coordinating Committee) whose party members were represented at the Kurdish Patriotic Conference will be dissolved. The executive committee is charged with advocating for the unity of the Syrian opposition. The Kurdish Patriotic Conference will work together with any all-Syrian oppositional coalition that accepts the majority of the conference's demands. At the same time, membership of all Kurdish parties in the all-Syrian oppositional coalitions should end.
No comments:
Post a Comment