2011/11/04

Nov 3 Pro-government

Half a Million Syrians in Tartous Reject Foreign Interference in Syria, Voice Support to Reform and Stability
http://www.sana.sy/eng/337/2011/11/03/379751.htm
Nov 03, 2011

TARTOUS, (SANA) – More than half a million Syrian citizens from Tartous and its countryside gathered on the Coastal Corniche in a mass rally to express their support to the comprehensive reform process led by President Bashar al-Assad.

The rainfall and the sound of waves crashing into the shore accompanied the national slogans and songs chanted by the participants in honor of the Syrian army who safeguards the homeland's dignity and security.


الرابح والخاسر في إتفاق القاهرة بشأن سوريا
Winners and losers in the Cairo Agreement on Syria
al-Baath, its cache
Subhi Ghandour
Director of "Centre for Arab Dialogue" in Washington
Thursday, November 3, 2011 19:43

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the details of the agreement, announced in Cairo Qatar's Prime Minister / Chairman of the Arab Shaikh Hamad bin Jassim, with Arab League Secretary General, Dr. Nabil el-Arabi, on the situation in Syria, too, hopes the success of this Arab initiative.

This initiative is the best option available now to all the Arab parties, Syrian, and the alternative is more violence and bloodshed, and threaten the unity of Syria and the Levant region are, in addition to legislation, all the doors Arab front of the international and regional aspirant some to redraw the maps of the region and establishing small sectarian and factional and ethnic and control the destiny of the nation and its wealth and an end to the phenomena of resistance to favor the Israeli and foreign projects.

Winner in this agreement is Syria first, Syria, the country and the people, by talking about the government and opposition parties. Winner in this initiative is the Arab nation threatened left with two options: the option of dividing nations or the option of internationalization and to make it under the foreign guardianship and protection again.

It is talking about the need for "regime change" in Syria, they have to realize what was confirmed by actors from the national internal Syrian opposition that the old political order in Syria had fallen and that virtually no return to the last before the popular movement. Syria now, and with the consent of its current leadership, is in front of the stage of a new constitutional will end the "rule of the party leader" and will be available by the Syrian people choose their leaders freely and transparently, and will see the Syrian society is a political situation where new multi-partisan, political, media and re-consideration for the rights of citizens without prejudice to the sovereignty of the nation and unity.

The Arab solution to the crisis now before the Syrian is not aimed at pressuring Syria to change attitudes and foreign policies were and still subject to pressure "Atlantic (NATO)" since the phase of the Bush administration and U.S. and Israeli wars on Iraq, Lebanon and Gaza. The initiative is the only Arab in order to save Syria and the Arab region, the risk of imminent and possible civil war and foreign military interventions.

The implementation of the agreement is the responsibility of government and the opposition together, especially in light of votes calculated on the outskirts of the opposition abroad have been calling for foreign intervention and rejects the role played by the Arab League.

The capitals of the NATO countries will inevitably upset (openly or tacitly) of this Agreement which is not associated with any commitments to change the foreign policies followed by Damascus in the past decade.

The loser after the implementation of this agreement will be anyone who has an interest in the fragmentation of the region and paid for projects of division and internationalization justify the start of the stage of "New Middle East" that is being worked and since the Bush administration. It will be at the forefront of the losers is to seek Israeli wars heated to ignite the sectarian and factional ends any case of resistance to Israel and give the Arab and international legitimacy to Israel's existence as a Jewish state in the area of ​​religious warring mini-states.


الافتتاحية.. الخيارات السورية
The opening .. Syrian options
http://tishreen.info/_ech.asp?FileName=26623958520111103043402
http://backupurl.com/mnuy4c
Word editor
Thursday November 3, 2011
Ziad Ghosn

It is not surprising that Syria's agreement with the Arab Ministerial Committee on the action plan to address the crisis with them, although some Western countries may dismayed by the announcement of this agreement because it conflicted with the hidden agenda which is trying to operate in Syria, and this in itself is a good indication so long as the West is not satisfied with the role of the Arab, it means that he is moving in the right way.

The reason for this optimism or Syrian welcome this agreement to two things:

The first is that the terms of the Action Plan, which was announced yesterday at a meeting of the Arab League Council, formed an essential part of the constants of the Syrian position and the strategy that worked Damascus to implement them with the beginnings of the events, call for example, to hold a comprehensive national dialogue initiative was put forward by Syria for several months without reservation on the participation of any party or citizen, and crystallization of the first features in the month of July through the convening of a consultative meeting included spectra of the Syrian society, moving later to the dialogue at the provincial level, universities and youth, and therefore the support of Arab States to hold such a dialogue is like the culmination of the stages made Syria in this context.

The evacuation of the cities and neighborhoods of all forms of armed and stop the violence is called for Syria repeatedly to help them achieve it because they adopted from the outset a solution based on political grounds the evidence of reforms made and those that are being prepared, but the emergence of armed groups, which began to kill and ruin and trying to fabricate a temptation for various forms, pay the state out of its duty to intervene to protect the lives of citizens and their property, and when these features finish, the state would be happy to return the forces of order and some army units to their centers and barracks as usual, and this security crossed the Syrian leadership hoped to achieve in more than appropriate and several weeks ago.

Second, the carefully Syria known as the depth of Arab interest in Arab issues and the success of any efforts of the Arab honest at the national level, and this point has dealt carefully and positively to achieve compatibility and success for the initiative of the Arab Ministerial Committee, they were not days only with the joint Arab action did not close the door to any sincere Arab effort in any field or sector targets the national interest, because everything that comes from outside the Arab borders built and marketed to weaken the Arab role, trying to plunder the riches of the region and control over its decisions and policies.

Welcoming the Arab agreement necessarily requires that the Arab states all of their obligation in supporting Syria's efforts to implement the terms of this Agreement, and by helping to stop the incitement of political and media and to prevent the flow of arms and money to Syria and overcome the unjust sanctions imposed on its people and its citizens, in addition to encourage all parties inside and outside Syria to respond positively and openness and a national perspective with efforts by the application of this Agreement, to the end where a strong impervious Syria with all its components and the spectrum and its citizens.


ما وراء الأخبار.. الحوار بين العقلاء وليس مع القتلة
Behind the News .. Dialogue between the rational and not with the killers
http://tishreen.info/_word.asp?FileName=26623958520111103043417
http://backupurl.com/rf9ll8
Opinion of Tishreen
Thursday November 3, 2011
Ezzeddine Darwish

All confirmed that the national dialogue is the safest way to address the crisis in Syria, and dialogue mean convergence, brainstorm, and identify areas of agreement and points of difference, and then move towards bringing the views of some of the others, the priority rule is always to the nation and its interests.

This is the dialogue called for by the Syrian leadership, and working for it internally and regionally, but the problem is in those armed terrorists, and holders of swords and machetes killed, and represent the bodies, and destroying public facilities shelling or burned, and the attack on the symptoms and livelihoods, and these favorites on the opposition, or (opposition) are favorites for them abroad, is it acceptable and reasonable to conduct a dialogue with them?.

Those from the standpoint of law, any national law or international murderers and criminals and dealing with them cannot only be according to the Criminal Code.

For example, the impact of these criminals in the hands of the competent authorities - and they are many acknowledged committing crimes unimaginable, and those who kill time, and killed ten times or more, ripping and burning, looting and raping, and the rest of them armed terrorists who are still fugitives from justice is not best perhaps even worse off than by virtue of time, does not accept any dialogue with the sound mind these?.

This is what we are saying is not a figment of the imagination, there is a demand from abroad through dialogue with everyone, including those killers, a justification that the big lie that is not the same gunmen among the crowd, which became a disgusting lie and say it is.

And (opposition) abroad not only to take these murderers upon themselves, but provide them with money and weapons you get from Arab and regional states and forces and Arab, and sees them spearhead able to overthrow the state. Note that these killers (working on the segment), as they say themselves, in the sense that they take the money as much as kill and destroy, and do nothing for free, and money they have first.

And the Council of Istanbul is the closest and cooperation with these killers, who provides money and weapons to them, and provide them with fatwas authorizing the murder, how is it possible that such a dialogue with the Council?.

In short, the dialogue between the rational, and not with criminals, charlatans, and opportunists.

No comments:

Post a Comment